when state tax laws change, tax pros & taxpayers respond like my cats

Like several parts of the country, this week we got abnormally cold temperatures and about 6 to 7 inches of snow in Nashville. We live on a hill on 16 acres. We don't normally get this much snow and definitely not this cold (zero or negative temps). Oh, did I mention we live on a hill.

So, when this level of 'winter' occurs, we basically don't go anywhere and just wait for it to melt. I do a little shoveling where I can. Actually, I did shovel my road on my hill so I could attempt to get out if I wanted to. Most people would have just played the waiting game. Not me. (Let's attempt to hurt my back for the sake of a clean road.)

My family calls this week - "snow week." A time where work pauses and my wife gets to play games, do art, and fun stuff with our daughters. In other words, a time where everyone is trapped at home.

While I continue to work from home as if nothing has happened.

THE CATS

We have three outdoor cats that we gathered up and put in our heated garage to protect them from the extreme cold. When I go in the garage every morning, one cat is content and just wants to be left alone, one cat is a little confused, but then immediately starts to eat and seems relaxed, and the last cat follows me around, wanting petted non-stop, looking like he wants to jump on my head (he's the anxious one). He keeps acting like he wants out of the garage. Our garage doors are glass. He will sit at our garage doors and just look outside and whine.

Sidenote - when he is outside and winter comes (starts to get colder), he will often come to our windows or doors and look in - like he wants to be inside. In other words, you can't make him happy. He always wants the opposite of what he has (sound familiar?). He thinks he wants out of the garage so he can play in the snow and cold, but he would immediately want back in.

Why do I share all of this in a newsletter about state taxes?

Well, I think life has a lot of great analogies for state taxes (or it's just because that's my profession).

JANUARY IS "SNOW MONTH" FOR THE TAX PROFESSION

We are in the middle of January and it is the calm before the storm for most tax practitioners. In the state and local tax (SALT) profession, there really isn't any off-season. It's busy season year-round. With that said, we do experience "higher call-volumes" during tax 'busy season.'

In addition to tax 'busy season' getting ready to kick-off, state government legislative season or sessions will be starting soon. Governors and others are already making their proposals or ideas known. Every year, states change their tax laws via these sessions. These changes can be unique to the state or they can be related to conforming or not conforming with federal tax legislation. These changes are in addition to the daily non-legislative changes that occur due to new interpretations of current law, court decisions, private letter rulings, audit adjustments related to grey areas of tax law that taxpayers did not expect to be interpreted in a certain way.

Some state tax policy organizations that are great resources for monitoring law changes or being involved in impacting policy changes are:

• The Tax Foundation

• Council on State Taxation (COST)

• Multistate Tax Commission (MTC)

• National Conference of State Legislatures

• Federation of Tax Administrators

The Tax Foundation published an article about State Tax Changes taking effect January 1, 2024.

COST has a lot of great resources that only members can obtain, but they also provide some great FREE resources such as their Policy Position Statements, Amicus Briefs, other studies and reports, etc.

The MTC has a number of uniformity working groups that you can participate in or attend that can be enlightening.

WHEN STATE TAX LAWS CHANGE, TAX PROS AND TAXPAYERS RESPOND LIKE MY CATS

Just like my cats, tax pros and taxpayers respond differently to tax law changes and this time of year.

Some tax pros and taxpayers will greet tax law changes like its no big deal, not realizing the impact or the reason why they should care.

Some tax pros and taxpayers will understand what is going on and be cautious and take a 'wait and see' approach, calmly waiting for guidance so they can make informed decisions and move on.

Some tax pros and taxpayers will be anxious, will want guidance immediately, even if the tax law change has just been proposed and not enacted. They will pace and want to know what to do (even if the law change never happens).

Regardless of what cat you feel most like, this is an annual, recurring event where state tax law changes can feel like an 'avalanche' of snow.

An effective state tax pro, daily monitors state tax law changes in addition to the annual state legislative sessions.

A state tax pro looks for risks and opportunities to taxpayers.

A state tax pro provides technical and cost-effective practical guidance. Identifying the grey areas. Explaining the issues and options. Providing navigation. A compass. A roadmap. Direction.

In the context of thinking of state tax law changes as snow, a state tax pro provides a 'shovel' or 'snow plow.'

CONCLUSION

Regardless of how you feel about state tax law changes or snow, winter comes every year. I hope you don't get trapped at home for too long when winter comes. I also hope you find your shovel or snow plow to move forward when the avalanche of state tax law changes occur.

Here's to spring.

State Tax Knowledge Update (29 items) - October 24, 2017

The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since October 16, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:

Some of the items may be on the same state/issue/topic, but they are from different sources which may give you a broader perspective to help your company or client.

1. Nexus New Jersey limited partner actively operating partnership

2. Louisiana Voters Approve Tax & Transportation Amendments

3. Pennsylvania loss carryover unconstitutional remedy percentage

4. Tax Foundation Updates Its Problematic Wishlist for State Tax Policy

5. The Jig Is Up: Republican Budget Resolution Finally Admits that Deficit Will Soar Under their Tax Plan

6. The Dishonest Pitch for Trump-GOP Tax Cuts

7. The Corporate Tax Code is in Dire Shape, But Trump-GOP Plan Would Make It Worse

8. State Rundown 10/18: Ballot Initiative Efforts Being Finalized

9. Inaugural Seattle Tax in the City® | Highlights and Takeaways

10. Local Policy Digest

11. Weak Growth in State Tax Revenue Persists in 2017

12. States' Tax Portfolios Drive Differences in Revenue Volatility

13. Sales Tax Rates in Major Cities, Midyear 2017

14. 2018 State Business Tax Climate Index

15. California FTB Expands Treatment Set Forth in Previous Notice on Water-Edge Elections for Non-electing Unitary Foreign Affiliates

16. District of Columbia OTR Informally Comments on Market-Sourcing of Sales of Non-TPP

17. Massachusetts DOR Issues Working Draft of Amendments to Regulation on Corporate Excise Tax Nexus

18. Montana DOR Issues Proposed Regulations Based on New Market-Sourcing, NOL, and Financial Institution Apportionment Provisions

19. New Jersey Tax Court Upholds CBT Assessment Issued Against Out-of-State Corporate Limited Partner on Passthrough Income Received from Real Estate Partnerships

20. Pennsylvania Supreme Court Affirms that Fixed-Dollar Cap on NOL Carryover Deduction is Unconstitutional, But Finds that Percentage Cap is Valid

21. Maine Revenue Services Discusses New Economic Nexus Provisions, Along with Existing Affiliate and Click-Through Nexus Provisions

22. Comments on Proposed New Mississippi Rule Requiring Out-of-State Sellers with Substantial Economic Presence to Collect Use Tax on In-State Sales are Due October 30

23. New York City State Appellate Court Affirms that Taxpayer is Subject to Tax in RPTT Matter

24. Wave of Amazon HQ2 Bids Unlike Anything Experts Have Seen

25. The State Tax Function and Emerging Technologies: Now Is the Time

26. Airbnb to File New Hampshire Returns for Hosts

27. MD Imposed Tax on MI Subsidiary’s Intercompany Loan Interest

28. Out-of-State Taxpayer Liable for NM Gross Receipts Tax

29. Remote work is still good business

The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LEVERAGE SALT to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.

Are Remote Retailers and Marketplace Providers in the 'Path of Totality'?

Well, it's the day - solar eclipse day. A once in a lifetime event. Are you ready? Do you have your glasses? Will you see the total eclipse or partial eclipse?

According to the Washington Post, "the path of totality — the 70-mile-wide strip of America from Oregon to South Carolina in which the moon will, for a couple of minutes, block the sun — crosses the homes of an estimated 11 million people."

A total eclipse is something that happens once in a lifetime (if you are lucky; every 400 years or so). Well, today, our modern economy is converging with past sales tax law creating a sales tax 'eclipse' and is having difficulty figuring out how to look at it. We need the 'right glasses' to be able to tax remote retailers (online sellers) and marketplace platform providers. Amazon, since it is the largest marketplace provider I am aware of, has become the creator of this convergence, or sales tax 'eclipse.' 

We - state and federal governments, departments of revenue, taxpayers and tax professionals - must accept the fact that this sales tax 'eclipse' is happening. We must also work together to find the 'right glasses' or we will cause damage to our 'eyes' (economy and state revenue). 

Currently, states have imposed economic nexus standards and use tax notice and reporting requirements ALL with the intent to skirt the physical presence standard established by the Quill court case. The physical presence standard requires a retailer to have a physical presence standard in the state before the state can require the retailer to collect sales tax. 

I am all for states figuring out the best way to tax these remote retailer transactions; or first determining if they should tax it. I get that the states need revenue. What I disagree with is how states are going about trying to make it happen. Adopting economic nexus laws that fly in the face of Quill to simply get companies to challenge the economic nexus law is ridiculous. States want taxpayers to either comply or challenge the law, hoping the U.S. Supreme Court will take the case and overturn Quill. 

The use tax notice and reporting requirements are more burdensome and complicated than simply collecting and remitting sales tax. Again, another indirect way that states are simply trying to get companies to collect sales tax. If you can't change the law, create a law that is more complicated so companies choose the less burdensome road. I get it, but I disagree with it.

Companies want certainty. Companies don't want to focus on sales tax, they want to focus on their business. They want taxes to get out of the way or at least be something easy and clear to comply with. Companies don't want to get caught not complying and have to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties. The problem is, states are trying to force new tax collecting obligations without working together with businesses and tax professionals. They are forcing it, which is producing uncertainty and more confusion. 

State taxes already present a maze of taxing jurisdictions all competing for business and revenue with non-uniform tax laws. With this sales tax 'eclipse' staring us down, all I ask is that we work together to find the 'right glasses.' I ask the states to stop forcing damage to our eyes.

Tax Legislation: Are We Asking The Right Questions?

State tax developments are everywhere. They happen daily. The question is - are we just reporting them or are we challenging them?

This legislative season has seen crazy proposals to raise revenue, balance budgets - all influenced by political pressures and confusion. We have policy organizations submitting reports and studies asserting that certain proposals are ridiculous or would either be unfair or detrimental to the state and specific taxpayers. This complexity not only applies to state tax legislatures, but also the federal government - as we know. The problem is that states generally have to balance their budgets every year to operate (although apparently that doesn't apply to Illinois).

One thing I noticed is that state legislative sessions are focused on raising revenue. Always asking what can or should be taxed? What new forms of business do we need to tax? What tax revenue are we missing out on?

I think those are the wrong questions. The questions we should be asking are:

• What services should the state or federal government provide?
• To what extent ($$) should the government provide those services?
• How do we prioritize those services?
• What is the cost/benefit of providing those services?
• At what point does the provision of those services cause detriment to citizens and our economy? 
• What oversight will each service have to avoid waste and efficient use of taxpayer dollars?

We don't always need more revenue. We need to rethink and revamp the purpose of government. Our governments should be lean and efficient. They should provide us with what we need most - not more or less. It's not about tax revenue, it's about efficient government. It's about the health and wealth of our country - financially, physically and spiritually. 

If we never ask the right questions, we won't get the right answers.

Louisiana's Gross Receipts Tax Proposal - So Good (NOT)

I just finished reading a post by Nicole Kaeding at The Tax Foundation about how confusing and bad the Louisiana Gross Receipts Tax proposal is. I couldn't agree more.

Why do states continually try to raise revenue by making tax calculations more complex which end up producing unintended consequences or unconstitutional tax regimes?

Many answers are possible, but I digress. Back to Louisiana's gross receipts tax proposal.

I had noticed that Louisiana proposed a gross receipts tax, but hadn't drilled down into the details. When I read Nicole's article, I couldn't believe what I was reading. I particularly love the flow chart she provides which shows the complex tax structure under HB628.

As the corporate income tax becomes less of a revenue source, will more states adopt something similar? I hope not, but as history tells us, states like to play copycat.

Here is a link to another post Nicole wrote which discusses what states currently employ gross receipts taxes and other states considering such a tax. 

Tax Foundation "Climate Index" Criticized by CBPP

Erica Williams, Assistant Director of State Fiscal Research at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), wrote an article last week highlighting a new website,"Grading the States: Business Climate Ranking and the Real Path to Prosperity." According to Erica's article, the website seeks to "debunk the state rankings from several organizations purporting to measure each state's 'business climate' and prospects for economic growth." In other words, the website does not believe the rankings represent a state's true business climate.

One of the several business tax climate indexes the website criticizes is the Tax Foundation's well-known index. I respect the Tax Foundation and have always viewed their research as thorough and well done. I have also always viewed such indexes and reports as helpful insights into a state's business and tax environment. However, regardless of the index or the organization releasing such a report, I always take the report with a 'grain of salt.' Any report can display facts and statistics, but just like statistics in general, I believe any report can be slanted to tell a specific story. I also believe any report or statistics cannot tell the whole story. For example, a state's tax environment and incentives will always play a role in a corporation's location decision. However, a state's tax environment is never the only factor. Also, a corporation's location or relocation decision is a 'customized' option. Meaning, every corporation does not receive the same treatment because states make custom incentive packages for different corporations. Thus, just because a state's climate index says one thing, each corporation may feel a different tax impact based on the incentives they receive or don't receive.

In summary, I do not criticize or endorse the website or the Tax Foundation's index. I believe the conversation is healthy and puts a spotlight on the importance of a state's business and tax climate for everyone. 

Just like with most things, we can all usually agree on the problems we face, we just can't seem to agree on the solutions.