letting go - no more 'quiet desperation'

Yesterday was my birthday. That infamous day when time stands still. When you stop to look back and reflect. When you look forward to plan, to achieve things that you want to do before you die. 

I don't mind getting older. I like the wisdom gained from experience. Just wish my body could keep up. Anyway, at age 42, I am truly blessed. My path to here has contained numerous twists and turns - some I worked for, others I tried to avoid. In either case, things always worked out.

One thing I've learned recently is that life is better when you have community - you are not alone. Many people, especially business men, live a life of 'quiet desperation' dreaming of some place else. Thinking of the things they haven't accomplished or the risks they didn't take. This is why I am trying to create a platform, a place for business men to interact and build community. Please join me. Tell me your story. Don't go it alone.

As a state tax professional, another year means more experience gained, and more of the same - states becoming more aggressive, taxpayers fighting to comply and keep more of what they make.

Life, like state taxes, changes every day. You can't predict the future, you can only prepare as much as possible and be flexible enough to adapt when necessary.

Take my advice. Life is too short. Today is the day to move towards your dream. Most importantly, don't hold onto life so tight that you choke the fun out of the gift each day presents. Sometimes we get so busy running, that we don't enjoy the ride. Let go, ride the roller coaster of life with your hands up.

this week's top 10 developments include: nexus, alternative apportionment, amnesty, transfer pricing and more

Rulings, court cases, and proposed legislation change the landscape of multistate taxation every day. It is impossible to follow all of it. I attempt to keep you aware of the items that may have a significant impact on a broad range of taxpayers. If you are following a major issue in your state that isn't listed below, and would like me to highlight it on this blog, please contact me.

Here are my top 10 for the week:

1. Tennessee is looking to establish click-through nexus for sales tax and economic nexus for income tax. Legislation moving to Governor (HB 644).
2. South Carolina issued draft guidance on alternative apportionment methods. Open for public comments until May 14th. Conference to be held on May 21st.
3. Maryland enacts favorable Amnesty? See McDermott Will & Emery's Inside SALT post for details.
4. North Dakota enacts law to phase-in single sales factor and repeal some Multistate Tax Commission provisions (SB 2292).
5. Louisiana proposes combined reporting (HB 775).
6. Missouri General Assembly passes bill that would establish market-based sourcing for sales other than sales of tangible personal property (SB 19).  
7. Nevada Senate approves bill to broaden definition of physical presence to cause remote sellers to collect sales tax, including a click-through nexus provision (SB 382).  
8. New York enacts multiple tax law changes as part of 2015-2016 budget (AB 3009).
9. New York enacted legislation makes numerous changes to New York City's taxation of corporations (SB 4610).
10. District of Columbia's transfer pricing enforcement program and combined reporting regime - appropriate? - read McDermott Will & Emery's post for details.

If you would like assistance in determining how any of the above will impact your company or clients, please contact me. Also, please contact me if you would like LEVERAGE SALT, LLC to comment, on your behalf, on the South Carolina draft guidance on alternative apportionment methods.

can you rely on informal guidance?

Each year, Bloomberg BNA compiles a "Survey of State Tax Departments." The survey is obtained by asking specific questions from state revenue departments regarding what may be viewed as 'grey areas' of multistate taxation.

The Bloomberg BNA State Tax Blog posted about how much weight should be given to informal guidance (like the survey) from state tax departments. The post and those that were a part of the discussion referenced in the post, raised great questions and points, such as:

1. How much weight should be given to informal guidance? 
2. The states know their responses will be published, so does that add 'weight' to their response?
3. The states' responses are NOT binding law and are NOT creating law.
4. What accountability do the states have for their responses if taxpayers rely on them?
5. Are the states' responses simply the equivalent of a taxpayer calling the state to obtain guidance? (meaning, it is informal guidance that is not binding and if relied upon, could come back to haunt the taxpayer at a later time)
6. If no other guidance exists (no statute, no regulation, no case, no ruling, etc.), then the survey provides some guidance as to what the state MAY do. Thus, this is probably where the survey is the most useful. 
7. If taxpayers are looking for formal guidance, they should request a letter ruling if the state allows it.

At the end of the day, taxpayers are always trying to obtain certainty regarding their tax issues. Unfortunately, it is not possible to achieve 100% certainty when the facts are complex and the state's rules are grey. Consequently, the taxpayer and adviser generally review all binding authority (statutes, regulations, cases, etc.) and unbinding authority (informal guidance, etc.) to develop support for a tax position. This is why we have the lovely 'levels of assurance' such as the 'realistic possibility of success' (33%), 'substantial authority' (40%), or 'more likely than not' (> 50%).

Depending on the situation, taxpayers are commonly balancing risk and the amount of dollars to spend to chase down this elusive certainty.  Accordingly, taxpayers are trying to attain the most cost-effective and practical solution that reduces risk to an acceptable level. Thus, other factors (business, legal, financial) may determine how much effort is taken to support a specific tax position, resulting in some taxpayers choosing to default to paying more tax to avoid risk.

Is your business struggling to find certainty?

What process do you follow to provide your clients with certainty?

How much weight do you place on informal guidance?

How do you balance risk and the cost of obtaining certainty?

how state taxes impact businesses of ALL sizes

Are you a start-up business?  A mid-sized business? Or a Fortune 500 company?  No matter the size of company, it doesn't really matter when it comes to state and local taxes.  If your company is doing business across state lines, your business is impacted by multistate taxes.

Common questions and issues:

1. Is my company required to register to file returns and pay income taxes?
2. Is my company required to register to collect and remit sales and use taxes?
3. Property taxes?
4. What credits and incentives is my company eligible to obtain?
5. My business operates as an affiliated group of multiple entities.  Does the state require us to file separate returns or one combined return?
6. How are intercompany transactions treated?  Do we have to addback intercompany expense deductions?
7. Is my affiliated group of entities unitary?
8. Does my affiliated group of entities need a transfer pricing study?
9. Are sales of services sourced differently than sales of tangible personal property?
10. What types of sales are included in the apportionment factor?
11. How are sales determined?  Gross sales or net sales?
12. Our company sales a service and a product.  Are we required to collect sales tax?  If so, on the whole charge or part of it? 
13. Our company has foreign (non-U.S.) operations.  How does that impact our state returns?
14. Our company is a foreign based company (non-U.S.) with operations in the U.S. If we don't have a permanent establishment in the U.S., are we still required to file state income tax returns?
15. How will changing the ownership and/or organization structure of our affiliated group of companies impact our state tax filing requirements? 
16. Do we owe sales tax on the purchase of a company's business assets?  Is there a bulk sale notification requirement?
17. If our company buys the assets of another company, are there any real estate transfer taxes due?
18. When can our company remove our FIN 48 reserve for uncertain state tax positions?
19. If our company owns an interest in a partnership, does that ownership interest give our company a taxable presence in the states in which the partnership operates?
20. If our company sells assets or liquidates a division of our company, is that treated as business or nonbusiness income?

state throwback rules make bad dinner guests

Let's imagine I invited 12 people over for dinner. For this particular dinner, each plate is filled and sat on the table before the guests arrive. As time goes by, all of the guests show up except for dinner guests #1 through #3. After about 20 minutes, dinner guest #4 asks if he can eat the food sitting on dinner guest #1's plate.

Another 20 minutes goes by and dinner guest #4 asks if he can eat the food sitting on dinner guest #2's plate.

Another 20 minutes goes by and dinner guest #4 asks if he can eat the food sitting on dinner guest #3's plate.

The above scenario is similar to what happens when a state has a throwback rule and another state doesn't tax the company. Dinner guest #4 represents the state with the throwback rule. Dinner guests #1 through #3 represent states that don't tax the company. As a result, the state with the throwback rule wants what is left or what isn't taxed by the other states, regardless of the fact that the food (or sales) was not meant for dinner guest #4.

The Council on State Taxation (COST) recently commented on a bill in Indiana that would repeal the state's throwback rule. COST has a formal policy statement on throwback rule provisions that asserts throwback laws seek to require companies to pay tax in one state on income that another state has chosen not to tax or is legally unable to tax. According to COST, a company's tax liability in one state should not be measured by its tax in another state. Throwback rules discourage investment in a state. Consequently, such rules must not be adopted and be repealed.

I agree with COST's position. A company's liability in one state should be measured by the company's activity in that state. A state should not be able to tax a company on activity that does not occur in that state simply because the other state chooses to not tax the company or doesn't have the legal authority to tax the company. 

As COST's policy statement mentions, repealing throwback laws will remove the constant discrepancies and arguments related to determining when a taxpayer is 'taxable in another state.' Throwback laws generally allow a taxpayer to not throwback sales as long as the taxpayer can prove that it is 'taxable in the other state.' Unfortunately, states have different thresholds and definitions for what it means to be 'taxable in another state' causing unnecessary confusion and controversy.

What do you think? Should dinner guest #4 get to eat other guests' food?

leverage salt - new and improved

I have been blogging since January 2009 and have written almost 800 posts on a variety of state tax topics. As of today, I have updated the site and it is now located at:

www.leveragesalt.com.

All new posts will be written and published on the new site.

All previous 800 posts are still online and will remain available to read at the previous site:

www.leveragestateandlocaltax.com

I want to thank everyone for making my blog the #15th best tax blog in 2015, according to Wallet Hub.

If you are currently subscribed to the blog, you will automatically be subscribed to the blog at the new site location.

Please let me know what you think about the new site. I would really appreciate it.

I'm looking forward to continuing to provide you with state tax developments and commentary resulting in practical insights and an independent view.