If alternative apportionment is wide open and anything goes, why have statutes?
Are we moving from apportionment to allocation when we use single-sales factor apportionment and market-based sourcing?
Is single-sales factor apportionment 'fair apportionment'? It moves income to customer states, not to states where the activities occurred that generated the income. Income is not based solely on sales.
Are throwback and throwout rules unconstitutional because they look beyond the borders of the state?
Should states be able to enact retroactive legislation to protect the state budget from financial loss?
Should retroactive legislation be limited to a state's statute of limitations?
Should judicial decisions only apply to the taxpayer involved in the litigation if it involves a refund?
STATE TAX KNOWLEDGE UPDATE (59 ITEMS) - May 22, 2018
The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since May 2nd, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:
Some of the items may be on the same state/issue/topic, but they are from different sources which may give you a broader perspective to help your company or client.
Wisconsin Explains Reconciliation with Federal Consolidated Returns
Indiana Offers Voluntary Disclosure Initiative for Out-of-State Retailers
South Dakota Provides Guidance on Foreign Dividend Recapture
Alabama DOR Issues Guidance on IRC Sec 965 Transition Tax Impact on State Tax Returns
California FTB Moves Forward with New Draft Proposed Amendments to Market-Based Sourcing Regulation
Florida DOR Issues Guidance on IRC Sec 965 Transition Tax Impact on State Corporate Tax Returns
New Kentucky Law Imposes Mandatory Unitary Combined Reporting Regime
Ohio Supreme Court Holds in Taxpayer Favor Regarding Credit Computation for Pre-CAT NOLs
Tax Reform Task Force Names Income Tax Proposals for Further Study
Taxpayer Asks US Supreme Court to Review 2017 Pennsylvania Supreme Court Ruling on NOL Carryovers
Alabama DOR Discusses New Law Requiring Certain Marketplace Facilitators to Collect and Remit Tax
California FTB Issues Final Report on California’s Conformity to 2017 Federal Income Tax Changes
California May 18 meeting on changes to market based sourcing rules
Connecticut Requires Bonus Depreciation, Sec. 179 Adjustments
Indiana Revises Corporate Income Tax Rate Calculation and Credit
Massachusetts Provides Estimated Tax Penalty Relief for IRC Sec. 965 Income
Oklahoma Creates New Credits for Vehicle Manufacturing Industry
Kentucky Claims Commission Amends Rules Related to Tax Appeals Procedures
Alabama DOR Issues Amended Rules on NOL Carryforwards and Revised Filing Due Dates
City of Seattle Poised to Impose an Employee Hours Tax on Some Businesses
Minnesota Legislature Passes IRC Conformity, Rate Reductions
Friday Tax Reform: States Issue Guidance, Waive Penalties for Foreign Income
Corporate Close-Up: Indiana Latest State to Respond to Federal Tax Reform
The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LEVERAGE SALT to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.
Will Your Company Owe More or Less State Tax After the Merger?
Is your company considering restructuring its business? Perhaps creating new legal entities or re-aligning its lines of business into different entities? Changing the ownership structure of the legal entities within the commonly controlled affiliated group? Or maybe it is considering acquiring or merging with a new business (unrelated third-party)?
Regardless of your company's situation, in each of the above mentioned scenarios, your company must perform its due diligence prior to completing any transaction or restructuring. That due diligence should take into consideration the impact the restructuring or transaction will have on the business operations, legal obligations, insurance, finance, and tax, etc.
Additionally, the company can't neglect state and local tax due diligence. If the transaction ends up costing the company a significant amount of state tax dollars now or in the future, you may be asked if these issues were considered or reviewed prior to completing the transaction.
The state and local tax impact can be material and varied. Some of the potential state and local taxes to take into consideration are: income tax, gross receipts taxes, franchise taxes, sales and use taxes, property taxes and transfer taxes.
Usually the biggest concern in regards to the transaction from a state and local tax perspective are:
1. Is there any sales tax on the sale or transfer of assets or change in ownership?
2. Is there any transfer tax on the transfer of assets or change in ownership?
The answers to these questions depends on the state or states involved.
In addition to the above, the impact that the restructuring will have on the business' state tax nexus (taxable presence) position across the country should be reviewed and considered before making any changes.
What do you think are the top issues/topics in state taxation today?
- State income tax reform/response to federal tax reform (which covers a wide variety of issues - depreciation, foreign income, dividends, charitable contributions, NOLs, Domestic Production Deduction, Sec. 199A, M&E, interest expenses, Sec. 118, related party expenses, deemed repatriation, like-kind exchange repeal, Sec. 179 expense, R&E expenses amortization)
- Wayfair Supreme Court Case regarding sales tax nexus/collection obligations/possible overturn of Quill/physical presence
- State taxation of foreign income
- Market-based sourcing impact (continuing trend)
- Alternative apportionment (is it all alternative?)
- Management & utilization of NOLs / 382 NOL issues
- Combined reporting vs. separate reporting
- Single-sales factor apportionment impacts (continuing trend)
- Whether to utilize Voluntary Disclosure Agreement/Amnesty programs
- Utilizing and negotiating credits and incentives
- State income taxation of pass-through entities (new pass-through entity audit rules)
- Related party expenses / transfer pricing
- Private letter ruling requests
- Other?????
Businesses Want to Do Business, NOT Taxes
Businesses are playing a game where the rules keep changing, in the middle of the game.
Taxes keep changing. A constant battle for businesses to keep up when all businesses want to do is business, not taxes.
Businesses must be able to do business with certainty. State tax laws already lack uniformity and create so many opportunities for businesses to screw up. Now, they keep changing, year to year, day to day.
Over the past few months as state governments have been in session, they have passed numerous pieces of legislation to balance the budget including changes to tax rates, filing methodologies, sourcing rules, etc. along with how or if they will conform to all or parts of federal tax reform.
I have been monitoring state tax legislation and have submitted approximately 30 alerts to clients regarding the changes (and we aren't done yet). More to come.
Let's work together to make state taxes less important, so businesses can thrive.
STATE TAX KNOWLEDGE UPDATE (62 ITEMS) - MAY 2, 2018
The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since April 11th, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:
Some of the items may be on the same state/issue/topic, but they are from different sources which may give you a broader perspective to help your company or client.
Maryland Legislature Sends Single-Sales Factor Bill to Governor
Oregon Extends Interstate Broadcaster Apportionment Provisions
Virginia Allows Modified Apportionment Factors for Certain Companies
Tennessee Allows Financial Asset Managers to Elect Single Receipts Factor Apportionment
New Arizona Law Updates State Conformity to Some Provisions of IRC
Kentucky Broadens Sales Tax Base, Hikes Cigarette Tax, Makes Other Changes
Digital Tax Arguments Focus on Role of Congress, Compliance Costs
Insight: ‘Wayfair: Covering the Waterfront—Amicus Briefs Supporting Respondents
A Brief History of the Biggest State Tax Case in a Generation
South Dakota v. Wayfair - TTR Explains What Tax Technology Options Really are Available
Cap on the State and Local Tax Deduction Likely to Affect States Beyond New York and California
Adopt or adapt? New IRS partnership audit rules affect states
New Jersey Permits Dedicated Prepayment of Anticipated Taxes
Maryland Phases in Single-Sales Factor Apportionment Formula
California FTB Issues Fourth and Final Report to Legislature on Recently Enacted Federal Tax Reforms
New Maryland Law Phases in Single-Sales Factor Apportionment for Corporate Income Tax Purposes
New Nebraska Law Provides Adjusted Basis Computation for Certain IRC Sec 179 Depreciable Property
New York City Memo Explains Deemed Repatriation Income under GTC, BTX, and UBT
Pennsylvania DOR Discusses Application of IRC Sec 965 RTT to State CNIT
MTC Approves Hearing Officer Report on Apportionment Regulation Amendments
Years of work to simplify the collection of remote state sales taxes may soon pay off.
Alabama Provides Guidance on IRC Sec. 965 Repatriation Income
Kentucky Clarifies Definition of Prewritten Computer Software
The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LEVERAGE SALT to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.