The New York Department of Taxation and Finance issued an Advisory Opinion concluding that the petitioner's webinar and live stream products are not taxable, but two of the optional services are subject to state and local sales tax.
28 State Tax Developments You May Want to Know - Sept 12, 2017
The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since September 5th, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:
State income tax return extended due dates 2016 calendar year
How Much Does Your State Collect in Corporate Income Taxes Per Capita?
As Political Division Grows, State Budgets Come in Later (If at All)
New York ALJ Rules in Favor of Taxpayer - Receipts from Online Services Sourced Out-of-State
New New York Law Extends Certain Real Property Transfer Tax Rate Reductions to 1 September 2020
California FTB proposes new withholding regulation for pass-through entities
State Revenue Volatility: An Inevitable Challenge With a Workable Solution
States vs. Marketplace vs. Third-Party Sellers––The Amazon Sales Tax Challenge
First U.S. Prosecution Over ‘Zapper’ Software Nets Guilty Plea
New York Tax Office Loses Another Case Against Remote Company
South Carolina income producing activity at customer location
NORTH CAROLINA IMPORTANT NOTICE: SALES TAX BASE EXPANSION PROTECTION ACT
TENNESSEE: Is there more than one formula for apportioning franchise and excise tax?
The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LS to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.
What Type of Evidence Do You Need?
If you are not a lawyer and you work in the state tax field, over time, after reading court case after court case, you begin to learn what different legal terms mean. If you have read any articles or statutes and regulations regarding the burden of proof taxpayers or departments of revenue must meet when proposing alternative apportionment, you have probably read the terms:
- Preponderance of Evidence
- Clear and Convincing (or Cogent) Evidence
But what do these terms mean?
Preponderance of Evidence
The preponderance of evidence standard is met if the proposition is more likely to be true than not true. Effectively, the standard is satisfied if there is greater than 50 percent chance that the proposition is true.
For example, in Mississippi, starting January 1, 2015, the commissioner may require a taxable corporation that is affiliated with one or more corporations that are not taxable to file a combined return with the affiliated corporation or corporations if he establishes by preponderance of the evidence that the intercompany transactions of the taxable corporation have resulted in the shifting of taxable income from itself to another member or members of its affiliated group not subject to tax. The commissioner may also require a taxable group of affiliated corporations to file a combined return if he establishes by preponderance of the evidence that the intercompany transactions of the corporations have resulted in the shifting of taxable income between members of the affiliated group (Miss Code Ann Sec. 27-7-37(2)(a)(ii)).
Clear and Convincing Evidence
Clear and convincing evidence is a higher level of burden of persuasion than "preponderance of the evidence."
Clear and convincing proof means that the evidence presented by a party during the trial must be highly and substantially more probable to be true than not and the trier of fact must have a firm belief or conviction in its factuality. In this standard, a greater degree of believability must be met than the common standard of proof in civil actions, which only requires that the facts as a threshold be more likely than not to prove the issue for which they are asserted.
This standard is also known as "clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence"; "clear, cognizant, and convincing evidence"; and "clear, unequivocal, satisfactory, and convincing evidence"; and is applied in cases or situations involving an equitable remedy or where a presumptive civil liberty interest exists.
For your reference, the following is a sample list of cases that have discussed the level of evidence necessary to meet the burden of proof:
- Equifax, Inc. v. Mississippi Dep’t of Revenue, No. 2010-CT-01857-SCT (Miss. 2013)
- CarMax Auto Superstores West Coast, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue, Docket No. 4953 (S.C. Ct. App. 2012)
- Microsoft v. Franchise Tax Board, 139 P.3d 1169 (Cal. 2006)
- British Land (Maryland) Inc. v. N.Y. Tax App. Trib., 85 N.Y.2d 139, 147-48 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995)
Note: the definitions above were obtained from "legal burden of proof" - Wikipedia. Other sources provide similar definitions.
17 State Tax and Business Developments You May Want to Know - Sept 5, 2017
The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since August 26th, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:
NC market discount income from US govt bonds is not interest
COST, EY & State Tax Research Institute Study: Total State and Local Business Taxes (fy16)
Oregon revenue online educational services sourced faculty costs
State Rundown 8/31: Modernizing Taxes is Sometimes a Sprint, Sometimes a Marathon
Net Operating Loss Carryforward & Carryback Provisions by State
Amended Colorado Regulations Address Combined and Consolidated Filing and Apportionment
VA Supreme Ct rules subject to tax exception post apportionment
The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LS to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.
30 State Tax & Business Developments You May Want to Know - August 26, 2017
The following are state tax and business developments I have curated since August 21st, and posted in the LEVERAGE SALT LinkedIn group:
Texas: Time to file a petition or request a hearing extended starting September 1, 2017
The Impact of New Use Tax Reporting Laws for the Future of State and Local Taxes
States Should Adopt a Version of Colorado’s Remote Sales Tax Law
Expect the Unexpected: Nuances of Unclaimed Property Oil and Gas Reporting
State Rundown 8/23: Few Lingering Budget Debates Cannot Linger Much Longer
Illinois amended regulations provide market-based sourcing guidance and other changes
Virginia Circuit Court Rules BPOL Tax in Violation of Import-Export Clause
Oklahoma Tax Commission Reminds that Amnesty Program Begins September 1
Illinois Department of Revenue Publishes Amended Apportionment Rules
The importance of learning what does NOT need to be done, and other things.
The above represents 'general curating' of state tax developments into one spot. If you still feel overwhelmed by the volume of state tax developments, please consider my 'custom curating' service. Meaning, clients hire LS to daily curate state tax developments relating to a specific industry, state(s), tax type and issue. You can make it as granular as you prefer. This allows you to reduce information overload, and only get the information you need to help your clients or company. This service is provided on a fixed-fee or subscription basis. Contact me at strahle@leveragesalt.com.
Illinois Proposes Trade-Show Sales Tax Nexus Law
Illinois has proposed a new law for establishing a taxable presence (nexus) when remote retailers attend a trade-show in Illinois.
This rule adds a new section to the Use Tax regulations providing that the presence of an out-of-State retailer or its representative in Illinois for the purpose of engaging in trade show activities establishes nexus for the retailer and requires collection of Use Tax on all sales into Illinois.
The rule, however, creates a "safe harbor" for retailers at trade shows. Provided that a retailer meets 3 conditions, the retailer's presence at a trade show will not trigger collection of Use Tax on sales into Illinois. The 3 conditions are:
- that the retailer attends no more than 2 trade shows per calendar year;
- is physically present at those 2 trade shows for an aggregate total of no more than 8 days during any calendar year; and
- combined gross receipts from sales made at the 2 trade shows during any single calendar year do not exceed $10,000.
The rule describes the types of activities that count toward the 8-day physical presence limitation; sets out how a "day" is calculated; and provides additional information to assist retailers in determining whether their activities fall within the safe harbor created by the rule.
The rule specifies that any sales made in Illinois during the trade show are subject to Retailers' Occupation Tax Act and applicable local taxes.
The rule defines "trade show activities," and provides examples of trade shows that are included within or excluded from the scope of the regulation.
COMMENT:
Everybody loves a 'safe harbor' rule because it provides certainty. The problem with a 'safe harbor' rule is that they seem unconstitutional or at the very least, arbitrary. For example, why are 2 trade shows okay, but not 3? Why are 8 days okay, but not 9? Why are $10,000 in sales okay, but not $11,000?
Not a fan.